**David E Martin**: And so if we don't go back in time, we actually miss the point that the Rockefeller Foundation and the Welcome Trust became the organizing entities which ultimately, in 1947, put the World Health Organization on the map. But what's really interesting in that is in the charter of the UN-affiliated organizations for the World Health Organization, they wrote into the charter the absolute liability shield from all criminal prosecution in perpetuity for any person associated with the World Health Organization and any of its activities, where it quite specifically goes down to the level of saying you cannot be prosecuted for any crime of any manner in any way as long as you do it under the umbrella of the World Health Organization.
It's important to realize that when we talk about the World Health Organization, we're not talking about an institution of the United Nations. We're talking about a criminal conspiracy that was put in place by two foundations who had a commercial interest in building a criminal liability shield for themselves. That's what it is. It never was a health organization; it was a criminal organization. And by criminal, I literally mean that under the Clayton Act in the United States, and under the Sherman Act in the United States, and under the competition laws of Europe, what they did was a crime. They colluded, they price-fixed, they did all of the things which are antitrust violations but put it under the umbrella of public health, and everybody is supposed to go, "Oh, they're doing it for the good of humanity." Except when you look at the actual financial statements of the World Health Organization, you find out that by 1950, and then again in 1955, the singular focus of the World Health Organization was—are you ready for this—vaccine promotion.
We have the Director-General of the World Health Organization going one step further and saying, and I'm quoting, "This is about population control." Now, what does that mean? That means that when we're taking orders from the World Health Organization, we're not. And fast forward to the Gates Foundation, which most people don't realize was an undisclosed settlement between the U.S. Department of Justice and the Gates—convicted of felony antitrust violations. Right, this was not just an allegation that Microsoft did bad things. This is a conviction—they were convicted of antitrust crimes. Quite mysteriously, the Gates Foundation just shows up and instantaneously starts laundering money into—are you ready for this—the World Health Organization. If you look at the financial statements beginning with the Gates Foundation when it was established, you start seeing an anomaly. It used to be that UN-associated organizations, and specifically the World Health Organization, had two-line items for most countries: the country, through an organization like the State Department or through a line-item budget, would allocate money to the World Health Organization
